• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Introduction:
The advent of online gambling has revolutionized the gambling industry, providing convenient access to a vast array of gambling sites. However, recent concerns have emerged regarding the negative consequences it can have on individuals' well-being, leading many countries, including the UK, to implement self-exclusion schemes such as Gamstop. Despite such initiatives, a significant number of non-Gamstop gambling sites have surfaced in response to players seeking alternative options. This observational research aims to shed light on the characteristics and appeal of these non-Gamstop sites.

Methods:
This study employed an observational approach, focusing on non-Gamstop sites as accessed by anonymous volunteer participants. Over a three-month period, participants were free to explore various non-Gamstop sites, documenting their experiences and impressions. Data collection involved periodic online surveys, interviews, and reviewing online forums and communities frequented by non-Gamstop players.

Results:
Analysis of the collected data revealed several noteworthy observations. Firstly, non-Gamstop sites often boasted a significant variety of games, spanning from classic casino offerings to emerging forms of online gambling. Slots and sports betting were found to be particularly prevalent. Secondly, these sites displayed different approaches to promotional tactics compared to their Gamstop-collaborating counterparts, often providing enticing bonuses with flexible withdrawal policies. Participants noted these offers as appealing, potentially leading to prolonged engagement. Thirdly, participants frequently mentioned the appeal of anonymous registration processes, contrasting with Gamstop's stringent identification requirements, enabling players to bypass self-exclusion schemes.

Furthermore, data analysis highlighted a lack of responsible gambling features present on non-Gamstop sites. Participants reported limited access to self-exclusion tools, deposit limits, and reality check functions. This was seen as both a negative aspect, as it potentially intensified problematic gambling behaviors, but also a positive factor for players seeking independence from external restrictions.

Discussion:
This observational research provides valuable insights into the characteristics and attractions of non-Gamstop sites. The wide range of game offerings and appealing promotional tactics present a clear alternative for players seeking an unconstrained gambling experience. The absence of responsible gambling features, however, raises concerns regarding potential harm to vulnerable individuals.

Conclusion:
Non-Gamstop gambling sites represent a notable development within the online gambling landscape. The findings of this observational study emphasize their availability, variety, and the appeal they hold for specific player groups seeking alternative options. Policymakers and gambling operators should carefully consider these findings when developing regulations and interventions to safeguard individuals from potential gambling-related harms on non-Gamstop sites. Further research is warranted to explore the impacts of non-Gamstop sites on vulnerable populations and potential strategies for their harm reduction.